2019 NearLaw (BombayHC Aurangabad) Online 459
Bombay High Court

JUSTICE T.V. NALAWADE JUSTICE MANGESH S. PATIL

Dilip Raju Aurangabadkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 242 OF 2019

9th April 2019

Petitioner Counsel: Mr. Jadhav Ravindra N.
Respondent Counsel: Mr. M.M. Nerlikar Mr. Dhake Vijay

During argument learned counsel for the applicant and first informant submitted that parties have settled the dispute.
She has filed affidavit to the effect that she has no objection to grant the relief and she has settled the dispute with the applicant and she has no intention to proceed against the applicant.
Rule made absolute in those terms.

Cases Cited :

JUDGEMENT

T.V. NALAWADE, J.

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent heard both the sides for final disposal.

2. The proceeding is filed for relief of quashing of F.I.R. No. 565/2017 and Regular Criminal Case No. 2603/2017 pending in Railway Court, Aurangabad for the offences punishable under section 354, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. During argument learned counsel for the applicant and first informant submitted that parties have settled the dispute. This Court has gone through the allegations made in the F.I.R. by the prosecutrix. She has filed affidavit to the effect that she has no objection to grant the relief and she has settled the dispute with the applicant and she has no intention to proceed against the applicant.

4. In view of the nature of allegations, this Court holds that relief needs to be granted.

5. In the result application is allowed. Relief is granted in terms of prayer clause 'B'. Rule made absolute in those terms.